Foundations

Three principles.
No exceptions.

Every Navon site, every layer of the stack, every partnership is measured against the same three principles. If a deployment isn't all three, it isn't Navon.

01

Sovereign.

Regions retain control over their data, infrastructure, and digital future — rather than depending on external powers. Residency by physical fact, not policy promise.

This is the test we hold ourselves to: if your data sits on hardware we operate, that hardware sits in your jurisdiction. Encryption keys are held in-country. Operators on the ground are local. Audits happen in person. Cross-border replication only when you ask for it.

In-country
100%
Sovereign HSM
Default
PQC ready
Day 1
02

Sustainable.

Built on energy-efficient, clean, resilient infrastructure that can scale within real environmental limits. Geothermal, hydro, solar — chosen at the source, not bought as offsets.

Diesel is for emergency backup, never primary. Site selection starts with the energy question. PUE is measured under load, not in spec sheets. The Hells Gate flagship runs at 95% geothermal from the Olkaria-Suswa 220 kV corridor — a hard ceiling on carbon intensity that we hold every site to.

Clean baseload
95%+
Validated PUE
1.29
Energy savings
40–60%
03

Accessible.

Locally available, usable, affordable — through open platforms, partnership programmes, and a price point that growth-market institutions can actually clear.

Hyperscalers price for the West. Africa-priced compute means affording GPU hours that don't depend on USD-denominated subscriptions sized for Silicon Valley. It also means JupyterHub for any university researcher in 60 seconds, on-site internships, mentorship from UCL / ETH / UPM / UPC, and quantum sandboxes for institutions that wouldn't otherwise touch them.

Universities
5+
Pricing in
USD · KES
JupyterHub spin-up
60 s
The Navon test

Six questions every
deployment must clear.

Before a site, layer, or partnership goes live, it answers yes to all six. If it can't, we re-design or walk away. This is the test we hold ourselves to internally — and that customers and partners can hold us to externally.

Does the data stay where it's supposed to?
Physical residency, sovereign keys, no cross-border replication unless explicitly requested. Model weights, training data, and inference traffic stay in jurisdiction — never proxied through an external routing layer.
Is the energy clean at source?
Geothermal, hydro, or solar baseload. Not offsets. Diesel only as emergency backup.
Can a local researcher actually use it?
JupyterHub via institutional SSO in under 60 seconds. Pricing that growth-market institutions can clear.
Are operators on the ground?
Local engineering teams, not air-freighted spares from Frankfurt. Audits happen in person.
Is the cryptography quantum-safe?
PQC at the platform level from day one. QKD pathways available where dedicated fibre supports it.
Does it scale to the next site?
Modular architecture, repeatable build, vendor-neutral interfaces. The second deployment is faster than the first.
Hold us to it

If a Navon site fails
any of these — call us.

We publish the test because we want to be measured against it. If you ever see a Navon deployment that doesn't clear all six, send us the receipts.